I. V. Gudkov
International Institute of Energy Policy and Diplomacy, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow 119454, Russian Federation
Abstract. The growing importance of environmental protection factors, including climate, in economic activities makes it relevant to study the latest trends in regulating environmental relations in the energy industry. The impact of this sphere on the environment in general and on the climate in particular is one of the most.
The main motivations of the “energy transition” to “clean” energy sources are considered. The directions of “greening” the regulation of energy relations in international law are studied: the impact of universal climate agreements on the regulation of energy relations and the use of “sustainable development” and environmental protection in international treaties and law enforcement practice. The directions for “greening” regulating energy relations in domestic law, on the example of the development of energy and climate legislation of the European Union and practice of “climate justice” in the national courts.
The main conclusions are formulated: 1) international climate agreements allow for a wide range of energy-related climate protection measures and leave states free to decide which ones to choose; 2) current international environmental law is less stringent and effective than current international economic law. Although the concept of “sustainable development” is increasingly used in international economic treaties and law enforcement practice, the scale of its practical impact, including on the regulation of energy relations, should not be overestimated. The “environmental exceptions” to the general rules of international trade and investment law are of real significance. However, the “environmental exceptions” in key existing international multilateral trade and investment treaties have a relatively narrow scope, and the prospects for changing these treaties remain questionable. At the same time, the practice of application of international treaties and the “new generation”, providing a wider “environmental exceptions”, is in the process of formation and it remains to answer the question of whether exceptions are to be interpreted traditionally restrictive or their importance in the regulation of economic (including energy) relations will increase; 3) the practical effect of growing “climate affairs” against governments and companies at the current stage, it is difficult to fully predict, however, the obvious legal problems (incl. related to the establishment of relatability and causation) with the involvement of individuals to account for the adverse effects of climate change.
Keywords: energy transition, renewable energy sources, international climate agreements, General agreement on tariffs and trade, Energy Charter Treaty, sustainable development, environmental exceptions, carbon footprint, energy balances, climate justice.
For citation: Gudkov I. V. “Greening” of Economic Relations in Law (on the Example of the Energy Industry). Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya = Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2020, no. 5, pp. 124—141. DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2020.046 (In Russ.)
Abbasi S. A., Abbasi N. The likely adverse environmental impacts of renewable energy sources. Applied Energy, 2000, vol. 65, iss. 1—4, 2000.
Alessi M., Núñez J. F., Egenhofer C. Suspended in legal limbo: Protecting investment in renewable energy in the EU. CEPS Policy Insight, 2018, Jan., no. 2018/03.
Aseeva A. (Un)Sustainable Development(s) in International Economic Law: A Quest for Sustainability. MDPI. Sustainability, 2018, no. 10.
Beharry C. L., Kuritzky M. E. Going Green: Managing the Environment through International Investment Arbitration. American University International Law Review, 2015, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 383—429.
Bodansky D. The Legal Character of the Paris Agreement. Review of European, Comparative, and International Environmental Law, Forthcoming, 2016, March 22. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2735252.
Brabandere E. De, Hazelzet M.. Corporate Responsibility and Human Rights — Navigating between international, domestic and self-regulation. Ed. By Radi Y. Research Handbook on Human Rights and International Investment Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017). Leiden Law School Research Paper. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2913616.
Burgers L., Staal T. Climate Action as Positive Human Rights Obligation: The Appeals Judgment in Urgenda v. the Netherlands. In Nijman J., Werner W. (eds.) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2018. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. Vol. 49. The Hague, 2019.
Byrnes R. Will Companies Be Held Liable for Climate Change? Brink, 2019, Nov. 26.
Byrnes R. Will the private sector be held liable for climate change? GreenBiz, 2019, Dec. 11. Available at: https://www.greenbiz.com/article/will-private-sector-be-held-liable-climate-change.
Charnovitz S. The Law of Environmental PPMs in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of Illegality. Yale Journal of International Law, 2002, vol. 27, no. 1.
Clarke M., Hussain T., Langen M., Rosin P. Climate change litigation: A new class of action. White & Case Insight, 2018, Nov. 13. Available at: https://www.whitecase.com/publications/insight/climate-change-litigation-new-class-action.
Coplan K. S. Fossil Fuel Abolition: Legal and Social Issues. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 2016, vol. 41. Available at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/1022/.
Crow K., Lorenzoni L. International Corporate Obligations, Human Rights, and the Urbaser Standard: Breaking New Ground? Boston University International Law Journal, 2018, vol. 36.1. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2984987.
Gibon T., Hertwich E. G., Arvesen A., Singh B., Verones F. Health benefits, ecological threats of low-carbon electricity. Environmental Research Letter, 2017, no. 12.
Gotev G. Nord Stream 2 seeks arbitration in dispute with EU Commission. Euractiv.com, 2019, Sept. 26.
Gudkov I. V. Competence of the European Union to Regulate Energy Relations. International Ecocnomic Law, 2016, no. 1, pp. 10—17. (In Russ.)
Gudkov I. V. Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Policy and the “Carbon Footprint” Issue In Determination of the Legal Regime Applicable to Energy Carriers and Carbon Intensive Industry Products. Pravovoy energeticheskiy forum, 2020, no. 1, pp. 34—40. (In Russ.)
Gudkov I. V. Zelenyy kurs Evropeyskogo soyuza: politicheskaya ambitsiya ili budushchaya real’nost’? Internet-zhurnal “Vsya Evropa”, 2020, no. 1.
Hush E. R. Where No Man Has Gone Before: The Future of Sustainable Development in the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and New Generation Free Trade Agreements (January 11, 2018). Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 2018, vol. 43, no. 1. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3373398.
Investment Provisions in Preferential Trade Agreements: Evolution and Current Trends. WTO Working Papers. Geneva. No. 2018/14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30875/ecc9b298-en.
Klugmann-Radziemska E. Environmental Impacts of Renewable Energy Technologies. IPCBEE, 2014, vol. 69.
Konoplyanik A. A. O novoy paradigme razvitiya mirovoy energetiki, riskakh i vyzovakh dlya Rossii i mira. Moscow, 2019.
Konoplyanik A. A. Tri mirovye gazovye revolyutsii: ikh vyzovy i vozmozhnye puti adaptatsii dlya Rossii. Vystuplenie na Energeticheskom seminare A. S. Nekrasova (zasedanie 200). Institut narodnokhozyaystvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN (Moskva, 10 dekabrya 2019 goda). Available at: http://www.konoplyanik.ru/speeches/191210-Konoplyanik-Nekrasov%20seminar%20200.pdf.
Low P., Marceau G., Reinaud J.The Interface between the Trade and Climate Change Regimes: Scoping the Issues. World Trade Organization Economic Research and Statistics Division Staff Working Paper ERSD-2011-1, 2011, Jan. 12.
MGEIK, 2018: Rezyume dlya politikov. Global’noe poteplenie na 1,5 °C. Spetsial’nyy doklad MGEIK o posledstviyakh global’nogo potepleniya na 1,5 °C vyshe doindustrial’nykh urovney i o sootvetstvuyushchikh traektoriyakh global’nykh vybrosov parnikovykh gazov v kontekste ukrepleniya global’nogo reagirovaniya na ugrozu izmeneniya klimata, a takzhe ustoychivogo razvitiya i usiliy po iskoreneniyu bednosti [V. Masson-Del’mott, P. Chzhay, G. O. Pertner et al.]. Zheneva. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/09/SR15_Summary_Volume_russian.pdf.
Mostafa Ben. The Sole Effects Doctrine, Police Powers and Indirect Expropriation under International Law [online]. Australian International Law Journal, vol. 15, 2008, pp. 267—296.
Newell P., Simms A. Towards a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty. Climate Policy, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1636759.
Oberthür S.Hard or Soft Governance? The EU’s Climate and Energy Policy Framework for 2030. Politics and Governance, 2019, vol. 7. Iss. 1.
Saldarriaga C. Sustainable production and trade discrimination: an analysis of the WTO jurisprudence. Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional (ACDI), 2018, vol. 11.
Sanderson C. Netherlands risks first treaty claim over closure of coal plants. Global Arbitration Review, 2019, Sept. 8.
Selivanova Yu. S. Changes in Renewables Support Policy and Investment Protection under the Energy Charter Treaty: Analysis of Jurisprudence and Outlook for the Current Arbitration Cases. ICSID Review — Foreign Investment Law Journal, 2018, vol. 33, iss. 2.
Setzer J., Byrnes R. Global trends in climate change litigation: 2019 snapshot. London, 2019.
Shell faces lawsuit from climate change activists over fossil fuels. Reuters, 2019, April 5.
Should Fossil-Fuel Companies Bear Responsibility for the Damage Their Product Do to the Environment? The Wall Street Journal. November, 19, 2019.
Simlinger F., Mayer B. Legal Responses to Climate Change Induced Loss and Damage In Mechler R., Bouwer L., Schinko T., Surminski S., Linnerooth-Bayer J. (eds.). Loss and Damage from Climate Change. Springer, 2018.
Stein E., Castermans A. G. Case Comment — Urgenda v. the State of the Netherlands: The “Reflex Effect”—Climate Change, Human Rights, and the Expanding Definitions of the Duty of Care. McGill Journal of Sustainable Development Law, 2017, vol. 13, iss. 2.
Titi C. The Evolution of Substantive Investment Protections in Recent Trade and Investment Treaties. RTA Exchange. Geneva, 2018.
Viňuales J. E. Sustainable Development In Rajamani L., Peel J. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2019.
Virginie B. Sustainable Development in International Law: Nature and Operation of an Evolutive Legal Norm. The European Journal of International Law, 2012, vol. 23, no. 2.
Wu M., Salzman J.The Next Generation of Trade and Environment Conflicts: The Rise of Green Industrial Policy. Northwestern University Law Review, 2014, vol. 108, no. 2.
Ying Zhu. Do Clarified Indirect Expropriation Clauses in International Investment Treaties Preserve Environmental Regulatory Space? Harvard International Law Journal, 2019, vol. 60, no. 2.